The last vote on eminent domain to bring about finality in negotiations to Block 12 almost a year ago put him in a position where a meaningful vote lay before him - the fifth of nine deciding if the City would reach this final point this week.
Occhipinti who has hailed himself for "Timmy Pocket Park" on lower Jackson Street, an effort he had no hand in delivering is poised to actually have an accountable role again where such a park could be built in the Southwest for the fourth ward.
His record for acting on behalf of a Southwest Park is mixed and sounding more cloudy as the vote approaches. He voted yes on introduction of the ordinance after an eerie pause to allow the mayor's proposed initiative to move forward but won't commit to it or his earlier vote where eminent domain was narrowly approved 5-4 with his MORTe colleagues voting no.
At the last City Council meeting, Occhipinti was vote number seven to approve and still he had to pause so the slow wiring in his head could catch up to his mouth. After an uncomfortable delay, he weakly eked out a "yes, on introduction."
The vote Wednesday is likely to see some more consistency. At least two, the Russo clan: Michael Russo and Terry Castellano are rock solid for no. The third ward councilman has been a model of principled consistency: no eminent domain for the public good as in a park. Alternatively, if it's the Kelo version where huge tracts of lands in the northwest are at stake moving to a friendly developer such as Frank "Pupie" Raia and all condo sales commissions are locked up under Mama "Five-bucks-a-tow" Russo, well it's game, set and match - full steam ahead. The Russo clan cleaned up taking in at a minimum hundreds of thousands of dollars on one upper grand shoebox development. (Is that what last resort means?)
Tim Occhipinti has a different set of issues and none are so rich to his self-interest. Earlier this year he walked out of a live City Council meeting to go downstairs where a Hoboken Zoning Board meeting was taking place on a problematic structure in the fourth ward that is quite literally riddled with violations.
The proposed establishment had, among many other problems, extended its construction out on to City property. Occhipinti attempted to speak on behalf of the developer who had lined his pockets with loot, a rarity in Hoboken - loot of the local variety that is. (Much of Occhipinti's campaign monies have come from outside Hoboken, an exceedingly high amount especially when you remove his wheeling benefactress Beth Mason from the equation.)
As Occhipinti's heart and feet have been clearly carried by developer money, he's stuck in a position where he's claimed on too many occasions to want a Southwest Park. He's tried to create wiggle room to get out of it leading into the meeting Wednesday.
Let's look at some recent comments quoting Occhipinti but first - let's go to the videotape:
Here's a snapshot of what Occhipinti is captured on video saying during election season:
"This open surface parking lot...the properties behind you... are part of the master plan for a Southwest Park... We have to use funds available (from the $20 million bond) and I fought very, very hard for that bond...we target properties here... to bring us the park."
Well this was Campaign Tim, when he was out at the exact very property that the mayor is now saying let's close on and get a Southwest Park built. So let's compare and contrast these statements from Campaign Tim with those last week:
“The [Zimmer] administration dropped the ball,” said Occhipinti. “They sat on [the $3 million County grant, and] they were not aggressive.”
Occhipinti also prattles on about the City not giving negotiations enough time to take place.
Forgetting Campaign Tim for a moment, do even these comments make any sense even if we give him the benefit of the doubt any of his claims here are true and the fact Occhipinti voted last year for eminent domain?
How does Occhipinti know the City waited too long? Where's the evidence on his claims or that the parking lot owners have not had a "properly negotiated" opportunity? (Is there a 2012 appraisal Occhipinti is referencing or is he just making it up as he goes?)
Whose interests do you think Occhipinti is really looking out for here. Well tune in on Wednesday night at the Hoboken City Council and see if he can make any sense there.
A parking lot or a park, Tim Occhipinti must choose.
Talking Ed Note: Just a funny observation, who did Tim Occhipinti fight against "very, very hard" to get the $20 million bond toward a park in the Southwest? It's the mayor's proposal and it's been backed by the council majority: Cunningham, Giattino, Marsh, Mello and President Bhalla.
Did he fight "very, very hard" against Michael Russo, or was it Terry Castellano or Beth Mason?
Did Tim Occhipinti mean more park or more parking lot?
His developer contributor certainly wants that parking lot for customers.