Tuesday, December 16, 2014

City Council Live - Rail Yards Development on tap

Note: The council meeting is captured here mid-meeting on the topic of NJ Transit and the City's alternative plan.

Better late than never. Timmy Occhipinti is speaking on behalf why the City's plan to work with NJ Transit's development idea scaled back is a winner. He's on fire, speaking strongly in favor of the revenue and other changes explaining why the plan is positive for Hoboken stating, "It's substantially consistent with the City's master plan."  He's opposed by members of the public in attendance advocating for nada.

This is a Timmy Occhipinti never seen.  "I ask for your patience... on these issues...they will be addressed," referring to open ended issues and an upcoming traffic study, one issue among others to be determined but he advocated strongly for the affordable housing component and the revenues aiding the City and public safety costs.

(Seen in pt. 2 available here: http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/56558164

The measure passed easily 8-1 with only Beth Mason voting no saying the scaled back version of the plan from over 9 million square feet and towers dozens of stories high to a scaled back version of over two million square feet is still too big.

Previously, NJ Transit's LCORE, its master developer since 2005 made various attempts to bypass the City of Hoboken and pitch their massive plan directly to Hoboken residents, it would host the pitch at various locales along Washington Street just last year.

Among those hosting LCORE in Hoboken to pitch the biggest, baddest development in downtown: 
Beth "Develop or Die" Mason.

The second flood pump for Hoboken was approved in an unanimous vote. The project is anticipated to take approximately 18 months to complete and is slated to begin early next year.

Up the Republic!

Related: Gotham & Hudson filed this take which is a very good, detailed read:

Community: Memo from Mayor Zimmer to City Council Regarding Flood Pump & Hoboken Yard Redevelopment Plan

Office of the Mayor announces:

Community: Memo from Mayor Zimmer to City Council Regarding Flood Pump & Hoboken Yard Redevelopment Plan

Dear Horsey & MSV readers,

Mayor Dawn Zimmer sent the following memo to the Hoboken City Council regarding the H-5 wet weather pump and the Hoboken Yard Redevelopment Plan. The memo and attachment can also be downloaded at the following link: http://www.hobokennj.org/docs/mayor/12-16-14-Memo-Zimmer-Council.pdf 

December 16, 2014 

Dear City Council Members: 

I am writing to ask for your support for two important items on the agenda that both support our City's effort to comprehensively protect Hoboken from flooding and help to support our transportation system. 

Flood pump: 
As the attached photo shows, the western side of our City flooded just last week, and has flooded significantly several times since Sandy. Funding for the flood pump on the agenda will help the entire western side of our City during major rain events as well as in the event of another storm surge. 

The City has secured a low interest loan from the State that offers interest rates below 1 percent, and we have been advised by the DEP that it will include 19 percent principal forgiveness on the total $11.9 million loan as part of a Sandy funding opportunity. 

The State has authorized NHSA to go to bid, but the funding bond must be approved in order to move forward. 

The portion of the loan related to the City Hall green infrastructure project offers 50 percent loan forgiveness. (This portion of the project is estimated at about $220,000 of the total $11.9 million loan). The City Hall green infrastructure pilot project is important to demonstrate to property owners and developers what can be done with existing buildings to reduce stormwater run-off and flooding in our city.

Last month, we held a community meeting with residents of Maxwell Place to address their questions and concerns. We provided a Q&A and also revised the interlocal agreement with NHSA for the project to include air quality monitoring. The Q&A can be found on the NHSA website at www.nhudsonsa.com/Public/H-5_WWPS/FAQs.pdf

This pump is a crucial component of the comprehensive Resist, Delay, Store and Discharge Strategy to protect our entire City from flooding. In fact, the Resist strategy that will protect our waterfront from future storm surges will need the flood pump as a protective measure. The pump will also help alleviate flooding during increasingly prevalent flash flood events. 

Mayor Turner and I have met with DEP Commissioner Martin and will meet with him again at 5:00pm today to advocate for the State to move ahead as expeditiously as possible with the Resist strategy to protect North and South Hoboken with the $230 million grant awarded from the HUD Rebuild by Design competition. 

Hoboken Yard Redevelopment Plan: 
Hoboken has a long history of community activism helping to transform proposed projects for the better, with our waterfront being the prime example. This project has similarly been transformed by City Council and community input. The original proposal supported by both NJ Transit and the past Administration was for 9.2 million square feet. This included a seventy story commercial tower, and would have added approximately 7,300 new residents to our community with several 40-story residential towers. 

Hoboken residents, some of whom are now City Council members, along with several of my Council colleagues at the time, raised their voices, and that project, which was on track to become a reality, was stopped and has been completely transformed. 

The original plan was not only supported by both NJ Transit and the previous Administration, but both took the position that NJ Transit had the legal right to build it even if Hoboken objected. In 2008, as a City Councilwoman, I, together with Councilwoman Mason, Councilman Russo, Councilwoman Castellano, and Councilman Cunningham, forcefully disagreed with this conclusion. In response, legislation was crafted in Trenton in 2009 to remove any ambiguity and permit NJ Transit to move forward with their own plans. Together, local officials successfully lobbied against this legislation. We then worked hard to create a completely new plan that would benefit the City of Hoboken rather than just represent the interests of NJ Transit and their developer. 

The new proposed redevelopment plan will revitalize our transit hub, bring jobs to Hoboken, add affordable housing, and provide funding for open space. It is also an important part of the flood mitigation plan that has received $230 million of federal funding. All of this will be accomplished while limiting residential development to approximately 950 new residents, a scale consistent with that area of Hoboken. 

Thank you to the City Council development subcommittee and the Council as a whole for working with my Administration on this redevelopment plan. Your leadership has and will continue to enable the City to shape this project in the best interests of Hoboken residents. Here are some of the reasons why I believe that it is important to move forward tonight with this plan: 

1. This project offers the opportunity to transform our transit hub. Given the fact that 56 percent of our residents take public transportation to work every day, more than any place in the nation, I hope that you will seriously consider the needs of our residents who commute on a daily basis. 

2. This plan offers the opportunity to bring jobs and create new jobs in Hoboken. Providing residents with more opportunities to work near where they live is one way to make our city less reliant on cars in the long-term. In addition, research shows that commercial development has much less of a financial impact on City resources because it does not expand the need for police, fire, and schools, as residential development does (For this very reason, I appreciate that the subcommittee stood strong and did not expand residential development despite pressure from the developer to do so). 

3. This plan offers the opportunity to require the developer to be a part of the flood protection system to comprehensively protect our City from flooding. It would require the separation of the stormwater and sanitary system, installation of pumps, and green roofs, rain gardens, and other flood mitigation strategies. 

4. Through the redevelopment agreement process, an analysis will determine a fair contribution to the open space trust fund. This funding could go towards funding a larger park in southwest Hoboken, the neighborhood that could be most impacted by this development. The plan would also require at least 4.5 total acres of street level public space and would create pedestrian plazas at Hudson Place and Warrington Plaza with a safe pedestrian zone, connections to various modes of transit, bicycle lanes and bicycle storage and shower facilities. 

5. The plan would create indoor public space that could be designated as performing arts space, accelerator space to support startup businesses, 3 bedroom units for our growing families, and at least 10% of units for affordable housing. 

As members of the Council subcommittee know, the City has to have an economically feasible plan that will stand the test of a legal challenge. While I respect the voices of our citizen activists, we as elected officials have an obligation to look at all the factors and understand that a plan that is not economically feasible will put the City at risk in any possible legal or legislative challenge. I want to thank you for funding our careful economic analysis performed by an experienced NYC firm to ensure a fair agreement for the City of Hoboken. 

The next step in the process, if the City Council passes the plan and if NJ Transit is interested in moving this forward, would be to enter into an interim cost agreement. Under this agreement, NJ Transit and/or their designated developer would be responsible for the costs of conducting future analysis needed to finalize the plan. Most importantly, NJ Transit and/or their designated developer would be required to fund a traffic study and traffic modeling analysis, to be conducted by a firm of the City’s choosing. This modeling would include an analysis of the traffic impact and the proposed changes such as the two-way service road connected to Marin Boulevard. 

Adjustments to the plan could be made based on the results of the analysis. This study can only be conducted once we know what the City Council will approve as a level of development. As you know, the plan proposed by NJ Transit has ranged from over 9 million square feet to 5 million square feet to 3.5 million square feet to 3 million square feet, with more than 40 percent residential and all of the residential located by the PATH. The City Council has settled on a very different approach, with the commercial located near the PATH and a much lower level of density, in particular for the residential development. Once the plan is passed, then it will be time to conduct this important and thorough traffic analysis. 

Given that the City of Hoboken has spent close to $300,000 on the legal, planning, and financial analysis for the plan, I hope you agree that it is now time for NJ Transit and/or their designated developer to fund the traffic study, which can only happen once a plan is passed and we have entered into an interim cost agreement. 

Please feel free to call me if you would like to discuss this further or if you have any questions in advance of the Council meeting tonight. 

Best regards, 

Dawn Zimmer

The Hudson Reporter and their friends

The holidays are upon us but the buzz yesterday rolled through here like an old diesel freight train with the whistle blowing down Washington St. the whole way. It was quite a ride all the way from up on 14th street where fascinating tales are woven with not sugar plums in the Hudson Reporter editor's heads but a Mile Square City where developers rule the land with a mayor sleeping at the wheel or on the take, no matter which. Are we having fun yet?

After a full month snooze when the story broke, the Hudson Reporter finally did a story on Los Federales investigating the Hoboken Housing Authority. The story was an odd mish-mash of old news and a battery of old "Carmelo Garcia said" excuses.

Where was the ever loquacious Carmelo Garcia's comment today on the investigation looking into the reign of his former Banana Republic? Suddenly your best bud (after Bethy's pet fish of course) is not available for comment? It wasn't even noted in the story. Asking the question wouldn't yield a threat of a criminal complaint against you like the editor here. Speaking of which...

Also, why was a reference to the New York City Housing Authority tossed into the story? Is that the only excuse FOG (friends of Garcia) could muster? Pretty weak sauce there. Aren't you guys suppose to maintain minimum journalistic norms?

Months ago back in the summer, a litany of serious issue were featured in the HHA's audit report. It's another area of emphasis in the Carmelo Garcia "ethnic cleansing" sagas which has been completely ignored for inexplicable reasons at the Hudson Reporter. Hey, journalistic reasons now, not  FOG or FOH - Friends of HudCo reasons.

Can the editors explain to the readers why the Hudson Reporter completely ignored the findings of the agency's own audit report? The story was handed on a silver platter and not only by a horse. That would have been one to hijack with no credit and no complaint here whatsoever.

Back in July, we're pretty sure you saw this big MSV headline:

HHA Audit findings spell TROUBLE for Carmelo Garcia

Among the audit findings never mentioned by the Hudson Reporter:
  • Two of five... vendors were paid over $100,000
  • "Questioned costs" totaled over $573,000
  • Payments to numerous vendors was out of compliance with prices authorized by the HHA Board of Commissioners
  • The HHA accounting department was "unable to print a vendors history report" 
  • One vendor overpaid without contract authorization exceeded $753,000
  • No emergency procurement reports were filed with the state as required under law
  • More than $100,000 in expenditures with the illicit use of a credit or store card
  • Section 8 files contained major problems and are "materially incomplete"
  • Costs deemed problematic connected to Section 8 can't be fully determined due to the lack of required documentation
  • The HHA is "not in compliance" with the Housing Choice Voucher Program and the Low Rent Public Housing Program regulations

In addition, the original MSV July story noted: "the audit report findings state payments throughout the year to a host of suspect vendors totaled almost $800,000 and the "state of emergency" due to Hurricane Sandy shows most of the expenditures "occurred outside the scope of the emergency."

Does any of this have an iota to do with New York City's Housing Authority?
So MSV invites the HR editors to explain. We're all ears.

Talking Ed Note: Da Horsey has more questions for the Hudson Reporter. This isn't the time but the time is coming when those questions can be posed.

See, I got these emails and their effin golden.